It’s a general principle: if Barnes writes it, I will read it. He is on that short list of buy-it-whatever writers for me. However, on this occasion, it was as much the subject of his latest novel as its author which persuaded me I needed to lay hands on the book as soon as possible. The Noise of Time is about Russia’s greatest twentieth century composer, Dmitri Dmitrievich Shostakovich (though he, by this account, would himself have awarded that accolade to Igor Stravinsky), and his tortured relationship with Soviet power.
Power, with a capital P, and its relationship with the man and his art, is the subject of Barnes’ slim latest novel. The book relates three episodes from Shostakovich’s life, each of them centring on a “conversation with Power”: one when he is a young man in the 1930s, though at that point already established as a leading composer in the Soviet Union, one from the early post-war period as he participates in a Soviet “peace delegation to New York, and one from later life, when he is cast in the role of Grand Old Man of Soviet music.
In all his encounters with Power, Shostakovich is forced to face the implications of being an artist in a totalitarian system. The first, in 1936 at the height of Stalin’s Great Terror, is sparked by the Dictator’s displeasure upon attending a performance of Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk, Shostakovich’s only produced opera. Although the work had up to that point received favourable reactions, Stalin’s disapproval is manifest immediately in denunciations in Pravda for “formalism”, “cosmopolitanism” and all the usual litany of formulaic criticisms, normally sufficient to end a career, indeed even a life. When an article subsequently drops in the epithet “enemy of the people”, Shostakovich, understands how perilous his situation is and looks to help from influential friends. Whereafter his first “conversation with power”, a summons to the “Big House” in Leningrad, where a menacing NKVD apparatchik questions him about his circle of acquaintances and makes it abundantly clear that a second meeting, scheduled for two days later, is likely to be decisive. The composer’s escape is the result - or so it seems - of the arbitrariness typical of the Terror, and leaves him in a constant state of on-edge preparedness for the worst, and camped out in the hallway of his apartment block by the lift ready to be taken by his expected nocturnal nemesis, saving his family the trauma of watching him dragged from bed and home.