Taboo-breaking reading?: "Look Who's Back" by Timur Vermes

About one and a half million copies of Timur Vermes' book Er ist wieder da have been sold in Germany, placing it firmly at the top of the best seller lists. The English publication, Look Who's Back, is one of dozens of translated versions sold around the world. For me, my eye was caught by the, um yes, eye-catching cover design (the same as the original German design), and the admonition of Nottingham Waterstones' staff that I should discover for myself what this publishing sensation was all about. 

The eye-catching cover

The premise is indeed a tempting one: Adolf Hitler mysteriously wakes on a patch of waste ground in 2011 Berlin, his last memory being a slightly unfocused one of the Führerbunker in 1945, showing his old pistol to Eva Braun. He now has to get used to his old capital 66 years on, and somehow make his way in it. So I overcame a certain hesitation I always feel about buying yet another Hitler/Third Reich-themed book, and picked the book up as a lighter antidote to the heavy read I was just completing (last post).

The story is told from Hitler's perspective, and much of its comic effect - it does have quite some comic effect - comes from the mismatch between his perceptions of modern Berlin and our modern understanding of the reality. He is for example gobsmacked by the prevalence of crazy women in Berlin's parks obsessively picking up their dogs' excrement, speculating that these are childless old spinsters paying the psychological price of failing to breed strong sons and daughters for the greater good of the Volk. The plot is driven by another misconception, that of those he meets that he is a particularly inspired, uncompromisingly method-acting Hitler impersonator. It is on this basis that he starts out with a short slot on a comedy show, warming up the show's Turkish-German host, soon becomes a YouTube sensation with his hitlerian rants about the state of Germany, and ultimately achieves stardom in his own right as a genius satirist of modern life and politics. Of course, there is an uneasy tension between the appreciation he receives from the media in-crowd and chattering classes for his "satire", and the, well just, appreciation his words receive from many others, this being the source of the book's more serious edge. 

Great American reading: "The Corrections" by Jonathan Franzen

Jonathan Franzen’s stellar reputation - in 2010 Time Magazine featured him on its cover alongside the headline “Great American Novelist” - is based on two hefty novels, The Corrections (2001) and Freedom (2010). Chronologically speaking, I read them in the wrong order, tackling Freedom at the time of its publication, but only coming to The Corrections now, 14 years after it first appeared.

Actually, not the cover of my edition,
which featured an armchair, for reasons
you will discover if you read it.

Freedom mightily impressed me. Yes, I too used that phrase, the Great American Novel, for that, at least without the capital letters, is what Freedom indisputably is. It was maybe because of Freedom however that I kept The Corrections on the shelf for so long. Some trepidation came from its sheer length. Freedom was big, and took me a long time. So is The Corrections, and as you may have noticed, it is an inordinately long time since the last post on this blog. But there was a bit more to it than that perhaps. I maybe feared a let-down: could The Corrections be as good as Freedom? Would it place similar demands on me? Did I need another such book in my life, even if it was as good as Freedom? Hmm. Maybe somewhere inside me there was a feeling that you only need so much Franzen…

So how did it work out, the plunge into the second (albeit first) of Franzen’s mega-novels. 

First things first, yes, it’s a Great American Novel. But this time round that expression is more ambiguous than when I used it in the Freedom post. What is great about it (again) is its depth, range and ambition. Franzen takes on America: its society, its mores, its neuroses and its dysfunction. As with Freedom, it is however done through the unbelievably close observation of a family, both as a family and as five disparate individuals. There is a sense of unease in the novel, a tinge of a society on the brink of something bad - a “correction” perhaps worse the comparatively gentle economic one remarked at the end of the book. Many reviewers have noted that the book predates (just), but somehow also anticipates the more anxious post-9/11 America.